<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gonzales Watch - Blawging the Ex-Attorney General</title>
	<link>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com</link>
	<description>Blawging Alberto Gonzales, Bush's Longtime Lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Pres. Bush Dodges Reporter&#8217;s Question About Loyalty Requirement of U.S. Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/03/pres-bush-dodges-reporters-question-about-loyalty-requirement-of-us-attorney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/03/pres-bush-dodges-reporters-question-about-loyalty-requirement-of-us-attorney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ALawyer</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/alawyer/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Attorney Firings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pres. George W. Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dana Perino]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/03/pres-bush-dodges-reporters-question-about-loyalty-requirement-of-us-attorney/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Bush dodged question by Washington Post reporter Peter Baker about how loyalty plays a part in evaluating and firing U.S. attorneys.  It&#8217;s a variation on the &#8220;loyal Bushies&#8221; test raised by Kyle Sampson, the Attorney General&#8217;s former Chief of Staff.
Here is Baker&#8217;s question:
Sir, your administration evaluated all 93 U.S. attorneys, in part on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/03/pres-bush-dodges-reporters-question-about-loyalty-requirement-of-us-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sampson Was in Charge of Attorney Selections in White House Counsel&#8217;s Office</title>
		<link>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/01/sampson-was-in-charge-of-attorney-selections-in-white-house-counsels-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/01/sampson-was-in-charge-of-attorney-selections-in-white-house-counsels-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ALawyer</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/alawyer/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />

		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Sampson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White House Counsel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dana Perino]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/01/sampson-was-in-charge-of-attorney-selections-in-white-house-counsels-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Kyle Sampson worked in the White House Counsel&#8217;s Office under Alberto Gonzales, according to the Washington Post, &#8220;he was in charge of U.S. Attorney selections.&#8221;
In a Dana Perino-esque way of describing Sampson&#8217;s status, he was effectively &#8220;keep[ing] the President&#8217;s pleasure&#8221; by culling through potential U.S. Attorney applications and recommendations.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/04/01/sampson-was-in-charge-of-attorney-selections-in-white-house-counsels-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gonzales Asserts Public &#8220;Confusion About My Involvement&#8221; In U.S. Attorney Firings</title>
		<link>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/31/gonzales-asserts-public-confusion-about-my-involvement-in-us-attorney-firings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/31/gonzales-asserts-public-confusion-about-my-involvement-in-us-attorney-firings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ALawyer</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/alawyer/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />

		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Attorney Firings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Sampson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dana Perino]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/31/gonzales-asserts-public-confusion-about-my-involvement-in-us-attorney-firings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Refusing to acknowledge that e-mails and testimony by his former Chief of Staff show that Gonzales was keenly involved in the process of firing U.S. Attorneys, Alberto Gonzales told reporters in Boston yesterday that &#8220;[t]here obviously remains some confusion about my involvement.&#8221;
White House Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino defended President Bush yesterday, saying that he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/31/gonzales-asserts-public-confusion-about-my-involvement-in-us-attorney-firings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Condition For Holding An Executive Appointment</title>
		<link>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/29/special-condition-for-holding-an-executive-appointment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/29/special-condition-for-holding-an-executive-appointment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ALawyer</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/alawyer/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />

		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dana Perino]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/29/special-condition-for-holding-an-executive-appointment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[White House Deputy Spokesperson Dana Perino should get a &#8216;Quote of the Day&#8217; award for her description of a condition for keeping an executive branch position serving President Bush.
Answering a reporter&#8217;s query about whether Bush&#8217;s support for Attorney General Gonzales &#8220;remain[s] contingent in some way on how Gonzales performs during his [upcoming] testimony on Capitol [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gonzaleswatch.com/2007/03/29/special-condition-for-holding-an-executive-appointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
